ATAC TV Firearms Channel DRY PRACTICE – 1 EYE OPEN

Saturday, January 7th, 2012

ALL SAFETY RULES APPLY! These drills should be performed at the RANGE or an appropriate area, do it dry, with an UNLOADED FIREARM!

Always abide by the four rules of gun safety:

1.      All guns are loaded. (Treated as such)

2.      Do not point the muzzle at anything you are not willing to destroy.

3.      Finger off the trigger, out of the trigger guard until sights are on target.

4.      Be sure of your target and foreground/background

Let’s talk about Presentation from the holster and doing it as a Dry Practice exercise with 1 EYE OPEN.  What the heck is this? This is the BASIC presentation, to get your handgun from the holster to “sights” on target, AND YOU CLOSE THE NON-DOMINATE EYE to get the 100% focus on the front sight!  OK, this technique IS required to guarantee that “LONG” shot or a close precision hit like a hostage takers eye socket, or just shoot a nice tight group.

You must learn that situations dictate the amount of precision sighting required for a hit, is measured in distance and target size.  More about this subject in the 2 EYE OPEN blog and the advanced Dry Practice Programs that will teach you the difference between shooting 3 feet OR 15 yards, as an example,  3’  -   2 eyes,   15yds   -   1 eye open. You need to learn the 1-EYE OPEN method first, then move on to more advanced techniques.

Everyone at ATAC Training courses trains with semi-auto pistols, but the firearms are carried in variety of locations. It does not matter what type or brand of handgun you run, but you are ABSOLUTLLY NUTS if you don’t Dry Practice with it from the location you carry it!  THIS IS THE DRILL THAT MUST BE REPEATED OVER AND OVER UNTIL THE PRESENTATION BECOMES A REFLEX ACTION!  THIS MIGHT SEEM BORING, BUT IT IS VERY IMPORTANT IF YOU WANT HIGHER SKILL LEVELS.

Understanding know and unknown distances prior to starting:

Start with establishing a known distance.  As you begin, or if you think you have judging distances mastered, that doesn’t mean you DON’T NEED to practice the basics.   Judging unknown distances is a stand-alone exercise.  On the other hand, we will give you two methods.  There are all types of controversy out there on one or both eyes open when shooting.  Lets keep it simple; if you were going to push a thread through a needle you would shut one eye.  Yes, we shoot with both eyes open and the conditions and distances will dictate using a dominant eye only or both eyes open.  Lets move forward and give you a simple solution.  From 7 yards and in you can get away with hitting “close enough” to your intended point of impact.  But, it will only be close to rather than the exact intended point of impact.  (As you read further down, between steps 3 - 4 you need to learn to shift your focus.) For those of you that think you only need to shoot with both eyes open, here is a question for you.  If you were held by the neck as a hostage and the hostage taker only exposed one eye every few seconds. Would you tell the cop, SWAT, or XXXX to, “use both eyes, it is faster, just shoot it is not a precision shot”. I doubt it, your exposed to all types of errors which could be fatal.  The point is, at any distance you need to guarantee the hit, not hope for the hit.  Yes, you may think this is advanced; no it is the basic fundamentals. This is not an range drill trying to hit a big steel plate; you are trying to ht a quarter over and over.  Then be able to pick up the pace.  As you excel in your skills, you need to ALWAYS give yourself a refresher course on distancing while shifting your focus from the target to the top of the front sight post.  After time you will develop a natural point of aim, which will ONLY last as long as your continuing education does.  So lets dry practice at 7 yards with one eye for now.  You can go to the next stage of both eyes open after you have performed at least 1,000- 2,000 dry presentations.  In our advanced programs we explain in great detail with video of what happens as you back up and forget to close that eye.  It a tactical environment, you may have to keep both eyes open to have a wider field of view.  But before you go off and start point shooting, get the basics down.  It is a safe number to say if you have 10,000 rounds through your pistol and 2 - 3 times as much dry practice, then you can move on to more advanced tactics with both eyes open.  In the end, regardless of how much you have trained just remember, if it is a precision shot, use your dominant eye only!  You may only get that one shot.

Check our the programs on www.AtacTv.com

ATAC TV, TOM CLARKE, MARK FLINN, LENNY BOLTON, JIM FULLER, JEFF HALL, GLENN JUSTICE, VENOM TACTICAL, RIFLE DYNAMICS, FORCE OPTIONS, ATAC TV FIREARMS, DRY PRACTICE, HANDGUNS

Democrats cling to their guns - ATAC TV FIREARMS

Saturday, October 29th, 2011

Democrats cling to their guns

Gun ownership is on the rise in some surprising places. As much as President Obama would have us believe that only small town yokels “cling to guns or religion,” a Gallup poll released Wednesday suggests many of the firearms that have been flying off the shelves in the past two years were purchased by Democrats and women. The Second Amendment has truly gone mainstream.

Overall, just under half of Americans said they have a gun at home, which is 6 percent more than had them in 2010. Not surprisingly, the highest ownership percentages are found in the South and the Midwest, and Republicans are the group most likely to be packing heat - up 3 percent. By comparison, Gallup found the number of Democrats willing to come out and admit to having a sidearm jumped 8 points from 32 percent to 40 percent. Since Mr. Obama’s inauguration, the ranks of gun-toting women swelled by 10 points to 43 percent.

This change has significant impact on policy. Nearly three out of four respondents opposed handgun bans - an all-time high. There are now more Democrats with guns than there are liberals who want to take them away. A half-century ago, the gun grabbers held sway over public opinion. Today, even misleading terms like “assault weapon” aren’t enough to scare up majority support for gun control.

Read Entire Article Here: Washington Times
, , , , , , , , ,

Record-Low 26% in U.S. Favor Handgun Ban - ATAC TV

Saturday, October 29th, 2011

Support for stricter gun laws in general is lowest Gallup has measured
by Jeffrey M. Jones
PRINCETON, NJ — A record-low 26% of Americans favor a legal ban on the possession of handguns in the United States other than by police and other authorized people. When Gallup first asked Americans this question in 1959, 60% favored banning handguns. But since 1975, the majority of Americans have opposed such a measure, with opposition around 70% in recent years.

The results are based on Gallup’s annual Crime poll, conducted Oct. 6-9. This year’s poll finds support for a variety of gun-control measures at historical lows, including the ban on handguns, which is Gallup’s longest continuing gun-control trend.

For the first time, Gallup finds greater opposition to than support for a ban on semiautomatic guns or assault rifles, 53% to 43%. In the initial asking of this question in 1996, the numbers were nearly reversed, with 57% for and 42% against an assault rifle ban. Congress passed such a ban in 1994, but the law expired when Congress did not act to renew it in 2004. Around the time the law expired, Americans were about evenly divided in their views.

Additionally, support for the broader concept of making gun laws “more strict” is at its lowest by one percentage point (43%). Forty-four percent prefer that gun laws be kept as they are now, while 11% favor less strict laws.

As recently as 2007, a majority of Americans still favored stricter laws, which had been the dominant view since Gallup first asked the question in 1990.

Americans’ preference regarding gun laws is generally that the government enforce existing laws more strictly and not pass new laws (60%) rather than pass new gun laws in addition to stricter enforcement of existing laws (35%). That has been the public’s view since Gallup first asked the question in 2000; the 60% this year who want stricter enforcement but no new laws is tied for the high in the trend.

Support for Stricter Gun Laws Down Among Key Subgroups

All key subgroups show less support for stricter gun laws, and for a ban on handguns, than they did 20 years ago. In 1991, 68% of Americans favored stricter gun laws and 43% favored a ban on handguns. Those percentages are 43% and 26%, respectively, today.

Relatively few key subgroups favor stricter gun-control laws today, whereas in 1991, all did. Since then, Democrats’ views have shown less change, with a 10-point decline in the percentage favoring stricter laws. Republicans show a much larger decline of 35 points. In addition to Democrats, majorities of Eastern residents and those without guns in their household still favor stricter gun laws.

See graphs here

Democrats, Eastern residents, members of gun non-owning households, and women were among the few subgroups to favor a ban on handguns in 1991, but now no key subgroup has a majority in favor. Those with guns in their household are least likely to favor a handgun ban.

Implications

Americans have shifted to a more pro-gun view on gun laws, particularly in recent years, with record-low support for a ban on handguns, an assault rifle ban, and stricter gun laws in general. This is the case even as high-profile incidents of gun violence continue in the United States, such as the January shootings at a meeting for U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in Arizona.

The reasons for the shift do not appear related to reactions to the crime situation, as Gallup’s Crime poll shows no major shifts in the trends in Americans’ perceptions of crime, fear of crime, or reports of being victimized by crime in recent years. Nor does it appear to be tied to an increase in gun ownership, which has been around 40% since 2000, though it is a slightly higher 45% in this year’s update. The 2011 updates on these trends will appear on Gallup.com in the coming days.

Perhaps the trends are a reflection of the American public’s acceptance of guns. In 2008, Gallup found widespread agreement with the idea that the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution guarantees the right of Americans to own guns. Americans may also be moving toward more libertarian views in some areas, one example of which is greater support for legalizing marijuana use. Diminished support for gun-control laws may also be tied to the lack of major gun-control legislation efforts in Congress in recent years.

Survey Methods

Results for this Gallup poll are based on telephone interviews conducted Oct. 6-9, 2011, with a random sample of 1,005 adults, aged 18 and older, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia.

For results based on the total sample of national adults, one can say with 95% confidence that the maximum margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points.

Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each sample includes a minimum quota of 400 cell phone respondents and 600 landline respondents per 1,000 national adults, with additional minimum quotas among landline respondents by region. Landline telephone numbers are chosen at random among listed telephone numbers. Cell phone numbers are selected using random-digit-dial methods. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member had the most recent birthday.

Samples are weighted by gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region, adults in the household, and phone status (cell phone only/landline only/both, cell phone mostly, and having an unlisted landline number). Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2010 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older non-institutionalized population living in U.S. telephone households. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting and sample design.

In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

View methodology, full question results, and trend data.

California Governor Has Four Anti-Gun Bills to Consider and Time is Running out to Request His Veto

Saturday, October 29th, 2011

Governor Brown MUST Hear from Gun Owners and Sportsmen TODAY!

Four anti-guns bills that are detrimental to California’s law-abiding gun owners have been presented to Governor Jerry Brown for his consideration.  Governor Brown has just over a week to decide whether to sign or veto these bills. The NRA has requested Governor Brown veto these bills (veto request letters linked below), but he needs to hear from California’s gun owners that such legislation only affects and penalizes law-abiding citizens while having no impact on crime or criminals.

One pro-gun bill did make it to Governor Brown’s desk, Senate Bill 610.

It is critical to call AND e-mail Governor Brown every day respectfully urging him to VETO SB 427, SB 819, AB 144 and AB 809.

Also, please urge him to SIGN into law SB 610.

Below is a description of each of the bills Governor Brown has to consider:

Assembly Bill 809 would require the registration of any newly purchased long guns. Not only does AB 809 violate Second Amendment rights by expanding California’s gun registry to include rifles and shotguns, it would also be a huge waste of taxpayer money at a time when California is drowning in debt. Gun control advocates estimate the cost of this registration at $400,000, a number that is almost certainly far less than it will actually cost to implement and enforce this registry if enacted. The only value of registration is to help governments confiscate firearms in the future. This is also NOT a program California wants to start while the state is drowning in debt.

Senate Bill 427 would grant authority to law enforcement to collect sales records from ammunition retailers, require ammunition vendors to notify local law enforcement of their intention to engage in the business of selling ammunition AND includes a list of calibers which would have to be registered to purchasers at the point-of-purchase.  This list contains ammunition popular among hunters and collectors. This point-of-sale registration of all ammunition purchases in the state would be available for inspection by the California Department of Justice at any time.  If enacted, SB 427 would add significant costs to the state, in terms of enforcement and lost sales tax revenue by driving business out-of-state.

Senate Bill 819 would allow the Department of Justice to use the Dealer Record of Sales (DROS) funds to help pay for enforcement of California firearm possession laws in the Armed & Prohibited Persons Systems program. The DROS fund monies were originally collected from every firearm purchaser to pay for the administrative process for background checks. This bill will divert and drain hundreds of thousands of dollars of DROS fee monies that YOU have paid for background checks. As a result, the DROS fund will certainly run out of money. When it does, they will almost certainly want another increase in the fees YOU PAY for FIREARM background checks in California.

Assembly Bill 144 would ban the open carrying of an unloaded handgun.  In reality, the open carrying of firearms by law-abiding citizens is caused by California’s unfair concealed carry laws, which allow citizens from one county to apply for and receive a permit while neighbors in the next county are denied that basic right in an arbitrary manner.

Senate Bill 610 would standardize the application process for a permit to carry a concealed handgun.  SB 610 would also delete the requirement that a CCW applicant obtain liability insurance as a condition of obtaining a CCW permit.

It is critical that you, your family, your friends and fellow gun owners in California CALL and E-MAIL Governor Brown to respectfully urge him to VETO SB 427, SB 819, AB 144 and AB 809 and to SIGN into law SB 610.

Contact information for Governor Brown can be found here.

It’s important that Governor Brown hears from every gun owner and sportsmen in California TODAY.

To view the NRA’s veto request letters, please click on the appropriate bill number.

Firearms and the Constitution Versus Treaties

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

Source:  TenthAmendmentCenter.com.

http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2010/08/18/firearms-and-the-constitution-versus-treaties/

by Lesley Swann, Tennessee Tenth Amendment Center

“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under that Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” – Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution

Recently I attended a gun show, where I handed out information material and answered questions on the Tenth Amendment Center.  Several people were concerned about the U.S. making a treaty that would gut the U.S. Constitution and potentially take away firearms from law abiding citizens here in the U.S.  They argued that the paragraph above from the Constitution places treaty law above the Constitution as the supreme law of the land.

Our Founders very clearly stated the conditions under which the U.S. Constitution could be amended, or changed, in Article 5.  It is quite illogical to conceive that our Founders would write such a brilliant document to be the foundation of our union, only to create a giant backdoor for foreign governments to come in and destroy the liberty we had worked so hard to achieve.   In fact, our Founders themselves said otherwise.

“The only constitutional exception to the power of making treaties is that it shall not change the Constitution…” – Alexander Hamilton

“I do not conceive that power is given to the President or the Senate to dismember the empire, or alienate any great, essential right.  I do not think the whole legislative authority to have this power.”  – James Madison

“I say the same as to the opinion of those who consider the grant of treaty-making power to be boundless.  If it is, then we have no Constitution.” – Thomas Jefferson

So, when I began re-reading this section of the Constitution I realized that they didn’t leave a backdoor, but in fact were expressly forbidding this type of maneuver in Article VI.  The answer to the riddle that confuses many people isn’t to be found in an indecipherable tome on constitutional law, but instead in simple English grammar and a little attention to detail.

In reading through the entire Constitution, you will notice that whenever the Constitution refers to itself the verbiage “this Constitution” is used.  The only exceptions to this are the President’s Oath of Office, where the phrase “the Constitution of the United States” is used, and here in the latter part of Article VI.  In every other place where you find the word Constitution written in the Constitution itself, it is preceded by the word “this” making it clear that the Constitution is referring to itself.  In the President’s Oath of Office the phrase “Constitution of the United States” makes it perfectly clear that the phrase is referring to this Constitution as well.

The Founders were very clear and precise with their use of language in the Constitution, so why do we have “the Constitution” in this case (“any Thing in THE Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding”), and “this Constitution” in all other cases where the word is written.  The simple answer is that in this case, they were not referring to the United States Constitution at all.

The humble preposition is the key to solving the intent of the Founders in this statement.  A prepositional phrase – such as of, to, or in – is a word that can modify and indicate relationships.  Prepositional phrases can also modify more than one object.  In this case, the prepositional phrase “of any State” refers to both the words “Constitution” and “Laws” that precede the phrase.  This means that the final phrase of this clause could rightly be read to mean “any Thing in the Constitution of any State or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.” The Founders weren’t saying that treaties were to be supreme over the U.S. Constitution, but that they could and would take precedence over the state constitutions and laws.

It is clear with a little analysis of the details of the language and grammar used to construct this clause that our Founders were placing treaty law in its rightful place – beneath the supreme law of the land in the form of our U.S. Constitution, but above the laws and constitutions of the states.  There is no loophole that can allow international interests to trump the U.S. Constitution, but the treaty must be made in pursuance of our Constitution, just as all laws that Congress makes must be in pursuance of the Constitution.

While some well-meaning (and not-so-well-meaning) politicians may claim that they can legislate via treaty, this clearly was not the intent of our Founders.  Will this knowledge stop those who would seek to take our freedoms from shredding the Constitution by attempting to pass such treaties?  Probably not.  But we can rest firm in the knowledge that our Founders did not give the Federal government the power to usurp the Constitution by treaty, and that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, not treaty law.  More importantly, we can use this knowledge as intellectual firepower to stop the enemies of liberty and the Second Amendment from doing so.

Lesley Swann is the state coordinator for the Tennessee Tenth Amendment Center and founder of the East Tennessee 10th Amendment Group. She is a native of Anderson County, Tennessee.

Copyright © 2010 by TenthAmendmentCenter.com. Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

If you enjoyed this post:
Click Here to Get the Free Tenth Amendment Center Newsletter,

atac tv firearms, Glenn Justice, Jim Fuller, Lenny Bolton, MALFUNCTION, Mark Flinn, mini 14, rifle and pistol, Rifle Dynamics, RUGER, Tom Clarke, VENOM TACTICAL

Ruger Mini 14 Failure to Fire - ATAC TV

Tuesday, October 11th, 2011

In the attached video link, ATAC TV Staff demonstrate a failure to fire with the Ruger Mini 14. You suddenly hear a “click” instead of a “bang” when you press the trigger. Other than the obvious reasons, such as being out of ammunition because you shot many rounds or you forgot to rack the bolt chambering a cartridge when you inserted the magazine. There are a few reasons for this type of malfunction to occur.

A bad cartridge in the chamber might have caused the malfunction, and/or the magazine may not have been seated correctly and didn’t grab a new round when the bolt last cycled over the feed lips, or your firearm may be broken. Whichever the reason, you should fix the malfunction quickly as there was a reason you had pressed the trigger. This might be a great time to make the decision to switch to a back up handgun.

This is what should happen when you get a “click” instead of a “bang”. Trigger finger goes straight alongside the frame of the rifle. You grab the magazine and rack back and forth to affirm it is seated properly in the Mini 14. Flip the rifle over while pulling back on the operating rod handle to discharge any cartridges or brass out of the ejection port. Always release the handle without following it down to allow the recoil spring to close the action, back on the sights and target ready to shoot if needed.

The short version:

  • You get a click, finger straight on frame.
  • Tap tug or rock the magazine to make sure it’s seated.
  • Rack the Op-rod handle as you flip the firearm over on the ejection port.

It’s important to practice this and every possible malfunction drill. A malfunction on a range may allow time to inspect your weapon for the cause of the malfunction, but during a life-threatening event, a couple seconds can make all the difference. You will need to be able to get your fully operating rifle back on target or transition as quickly as possible. Practicing these drills may make the difference when your life is on the line! Watch the video linked below for a detailed description of the clearance of this malfunction.

Watch Now: Ruger Mini 14 Failure to Fire Program

ATAC TV FIREARMS, TOM CLARKE, MARK FLINN, LENNY BOLTON, JIM FULLER, GLENN JUSTICE, RIFLE DYNAMICS, VENOM TACTICAL,

MARKFLINN.ME

Kahr Arms Company - ATAC TV™ FIREARMS CHANNEL

Monday, September 5th, 2011

Kahr Arms produce compact and mid-sized semi-automatic pistols of ingenious design and forethought as a American small arms manufacturer with office headquarters in Blauvelt, New York. Founded in 1995 by Kook Jin “Justin” Moon, Kahr Arms offers small, well-made pistols built around some very powerful and popular cartridges such as 9mm Luger Parabellum, .40 S&W and .45 ACP for the self-protection buying public. ATAC TV Firearms Channel has tested and reviewed some of these “pocket cannons” over the years due to their popularity and use as a concealed carry firearms platform.

The company, Kahr Arms was in a perfect position to produce viable carry guns for the American public immediately after the U.S Government ban “high-capacity” magazines of more than 10 rounds in 1994. Kahr would build a series of pistols for the gun owners that consist of small, slender and powerful handguns that proved to be very popular, especially to Americans that carry a concealed firearm.

These Kahr actions are designed using a Browning locked-breech design, which include a striker-operated firing pin and passive firing pin safety block. When the trigger is pressed, a double-lobed cocking cam rotates, pulling the striker back and the firing pin safety block is depressed and deactivated, eventually releasing the firing pin to strike the primer of the cartridge. The cocking cam is a single piece takes the place of more fragile and complicated designs of other pistol firing systems, in addition to the firing pin safety plunger located further to the rear of the slide to eliminate fouling from combustion gasses. Justin Moon has five patents owned and incorporated in the Kahr pistol design.

Similar to a double-action trigger system in a revolver, the Kahr has a short 3/8” trigger travel distance that aids in control of the firing process and is easy to learn. The initial Kahr K9, offered consumers a full-power 9mm Parabellum handgun that competed in physical size with the common small-sized pistols usually chambered in calibers such as the “pocket pistols” in .380 ACP, .32 ACP and even the little caliber guns in .22 LR.

Since the first K9 pistol, Kahr Arms produces other pistol configurations, in different calibers, such as polymer frames to lighten the weight. They also offer an economy line of pistols identical to the P series but without some of the high-end features to reduce cost to the consumer. None of these eliminated features affect the basic structure or reliability of the base pistol. Simple things to cut cost are used such as pinning the front sight, instead of cutting dovetails, engraving rather than more expensive “rolled-on” lettering, traditional rifled barrel rather than the original polygonal style, and including one magazine instead of two in the package. Short cuts that benefited the buying public, saving initial costs and allowing ownership of the basic model of Kahr pistols without affecting the performance and reliability of the pistol. Great idea Kahr!

Overall, these pistols are high-quality, rugged and reliable firearms. The perfect fit for concealed carry or deep-carry applications of the general public or Law Enforcement Officers back-up guns. The Kahr pistol lines incorporate small size, good caliber choices, and excellent design features make these pistols very desirable. ATAC TV Firearms Channel will be producing instructional videos on the use and deployment of these great handguns for concealed carry and back-up applications for LEO. Expect to see more innovation from Kahr Arms!

ATAC TV™ FIREARMS, ATAC TV LEO/MIL, LENNY BOLTON, MARK FLINN, Tom Clarke™, FIREARMS, GUNS, COLT, BUSHMASTER,

ATAC TV LEO / Mil Blog: AR-15 Unloading

Monday, September 5th, 2011

AR-15 Unloading

Unloading the AR-15 is important as with any weapon platform and is recommended training by ATAC TV LEO/Mil channel. Knowing how your AR-15 rifle functions is extremely relevant for safe handling of the firearm. There are a couple of different ways to safely unload the semi-auto carbine to guaranty this firearm is safe for storage or handling. The proper steps to accomplish this task are simple but must be practiced as with any other administrative duty or handling of a firearm.

  • In this method of unloading, it starts with a chamber check to verify that the gun is actually loaded. With your trigger finger straight along the frame on the predetermined reference point, and the AR-15 fire selector in the safe position, remove the magazine and stow it in a pocket or dump bag. Grasp the charging handle in a pinch grip with your index finger and thumb, rack the bolt back vigorously and hold to the rear. With this method, you will notice the cartridge fly out of the ejection port and can visually inspect the chamber to insure it is empty. Now, either lock the bolt back to the rear with the bolt catch or release the charging handle allowing the bolt group to close while insuring the charging handle is locked into the upper receiver. This AR-15 is now verified to be empty, unloaded and safe.
  • Another method to accomplish the same goal is slightly different, but will result in the Ar-15 being unloaded. First, verify the fire selector is in the safe position and chamber check the chamber to determine the condition of the rifle. To unload, push the magazine release button with your trigger finger to release and stow the magazine in a pocket or somewhere on your body. With your firing hand, grab the charging handle with your index and middle fingers and rack the bolt group back as you place your support hand over the ejection port and rotate the rifle so that port is pointed toward the ground. As the bolt comes out of battery, the ejected cartridge will fall into your support hand, then use your support side thumb to press on the lower portion of the bolt catch to lock the bolt in the rear ward position. Push the charging handle into the upper receiver and insure it has locked in place. Visually inspect the chamber and magazine well to verify the AR-15 is unloaded.

This is not a difficult task, but must be performed in the proper order to insure safe handling of the firearm. Always know the condition of your weapon. It is important to know if the firearm is loaded or not. Most unloading is an administrative task that is performed after any action or training. Take your time and practice this skill as you do with other techniques such as malfunction clearance, loading, or safe rifle handling and tactics. It takes training, do it correctly.

ATAC TV FIREARMS, ATAC TV LEO/MIL, LENNY BOLTON, JIM FULLER, MARK FLINN, TOM CLARKE, FIREARMS, GUNS, RIFLE DYNAMICS, VENOM TACTICAL, AR-15, AK-47

California Police Sticking to Guns in Defense of Letting Kids Hold Automatic Weapons

Thursday, August 18th, 2011

Would you let your kid touch a machine gun?

SOURCE: FOX NEWS -

Photos of officers from the Santa Rosa Police Department letting kids handle the department’s SWAT team weaponry at a community event has sparked a debate over how much exposure to guns is healthy for kids.

Community organizer Attila Nagy, who took the photos, told FoxNews.com that he was concerned it might encourage kids to use guns in the future.

“My main concern is for kids who handle these things. They’re fascinated by them, and it makes them familiar with guns,” he said.

One city councilwoman, Marsha Vas Dupre, told her local paper that she was “alarmed and devastated” by the photos.

But the police department is pushing back, saying they see nothing wrong with how they handled the event.

“The weapons are rendered safe and are unloaded. We ensure the safety of those weapons,” Santa Rosa Police Capt. Gary Negri told FoxNews.com, adding that the police attend the event to build ties between the police and the community.

“Our goal is saying to people, ‘hey, don’t be intimidated by the police.’ We want to break down that barrier… Once these events are over, people will be more comfortable having conversations with officers.”

Another goal, Negri said, was to educate kids about guns.

“Education and gun safety is a component of what we do… We teach kids the difference between a real gun and a Toys R’ Us gun.”

But the department’s response hasn’t convinced everyone. One woman, Elaine Holtz, was so concerned by the SWAT team’s weapons that she approached the police officer at the community event and asked what was going on.

“I would not want my child to be involved with something like that… Those guns, they should have been behind glass — to teach the kids that you don’t want to deal with this gun, because it kills.” Holtz told FoxNews.com.

“I am coming from the heart of a woman, a mother, a grandmother,” she added.

Despite the complaints, some gun safety experts say the police are right — and that data shows kids who grow up with legal guns are actually less likely to get into trouble.

“A U.S. Department of Justice study showed that children introduced to firearms by their fathers had a lower rate of delinquency than children who learned about guns on the street, or even children who had no experience with guns at all,” Dr. Tim Wheeling, of the group Doctors for Responsible Gun Ownership, told FoxNews.com.

The 1994 Justice Department report concluded: “Boys who own legal firearms… are even slightly less delinquent than nonowners of guns.” Specifically, 14 percent of kids with legal firearms committed street crimes, compared to 24 percent of kids with no guns at home.

Given that, Wheeling said, the response to the police actions seemed overblown.

“If this controlled lesson in firearms helped the kids understand that guns are not toys, some good could come from it. The knee-jerk rejection to the police outreach by locals was clearly excessive.”

The pro-gun control Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence declined to comment.

Whether the police event actually helped the kids understand that guns are not toys is a matter of debate.

“It wasn’t a safety thing,” Nagy said, contesting the police version of the story. “That’s misinformation. I was there. The gun was displayed, and kids just picked it up and played with it.”

Nagy cited his photos as evidence.

“In one of the photos I took, as Elaine Holtz was talking with the officer, you can see a little boy is reaching up to the table and grabbing a gun… the youngest kid there was maybe 5 years old.”

Holtz said that when she asked the officer what was going on, he replied that they were doing “training,” but that she did not find his answer convincing.

“I did not see any education going on; it looked like it was just fun,” she said. “And I think we generally have a good police department. But what happened here was poorly thought out.”

Police Capt. Negri said that the department is looking at “whether we want to change our tack in the future.” But for now, the police are sticking to their guns.

“Gun safety is a part of the discussions we have with the kids,” Negri said. “These kids, what do they learn about guns from video games, movies and TV? A lot of the questions we get from kids are way off base… So it’s helpful to have some realistic dialogue.”

Children and Firearms Safety

Wednesday, August 10th, 2011


Source: American DerringerFor as long as there have been firearms, there has been the need to protect and educate our children when it comes to safe use and storage. One of the biggest problems we have today is that there is not enough firearms safety training for children. Here at American Derringer Corp., we are as concerned about your children and their safety as you are. Here are some basic rules and suggestions for making your home a safe environment for both children and your firearms.

  • Don’t try to hide a gun in the house, thinking that the child will never find it. They will. Children have the ability to find anything adults can hide. And, the better something is hidden, the harder the child will look for it, and the more importance it will have to the child once it is found.
  • Avoid attaching any mystique to the firearm through flat prohibition. Nothing gets a child’s attention faster or stronger than being told “No,” without explanation or reasoning. Children are smart, and will see through flat prohibition.
  • If you carry a firearm on a daily basis, be sure to secure it when you get home. Make sure that your child knows you do this, and why.
  • Teach your children these basic firearms safety rules:
    • Always assume that a gun is loaded, even after you have personally unloaded it.
    • Never point a firearm at another person. Never point a firearm in the direction of anything except a proper target at a range or while hunting.
    • Never handle a firearm unnecessarily.
    • Never accept a firearm from another person unless they have shown it to be unloaded in front of you. Never assume.
    • Always verify the unloaded condition of a firearm.
    • Never throw, drop, or otherwise mishandle a firearm.
    • When encountering a strange gun (say laying on the street), do not pick it up. Contact an adult (preferably a law enforcement officer) as soon as possible. When possible, keep other children away from the gun. Do not make any assumptions about a “found” weapon.”
    • When firing at a range, always keep the gun pointed down range, towards the targets.
    • A firearm is not a toy. Do not treat it like one.
    • Do not show off firearms to friends and schoolmates. And, do not tell friends and schoolmates that there are firearms in the house. Do not take a firearm from its place without a parent present.
    • Always use proper ear and eye protection when at the range.
    • A firearm is not a status symbol, or indicator of strength. Do not use it as one.
    • Whenever you are in doubt about a firearm, do not touch it. Get an adult to check it for you.
    • Remember, it is our right to keep and bear arms, but it also our responsibility to do so safely.
      It only takes one little mistake to cause a big accident.
    • Let them know that firearms are capable of bodily injury, destruction and possibly death if misused. Do not “soft-soap” the truth. Apply the same principles as Driver’s Education courses in the schools do.
  • Start your children off right by showing them the ropes about guns. This includes showing them the proper procedures for unloading, verifying and handling a firearm. Where available, a certified instructor should be used to teach proper shooting and safety technique.
  • Make sure to show your children how to clean and care for a firearm. A dirty, or abused gun is more dangerous than any other.
  • Encourage your children to learn these safety rules, and to follow them. One method that helps is to take them to the range (once they are old enough to handle a firearm) and let them shoot. Another method is to use airguns in early training and safety education. This will not only further strengthen the other lessons, but will also serve to remove the mystique that has been put up around firearms. It is this mystique that leads to most firearms accidents today.
  • Remember, nothing is as good as education, and open, honest discussion.
  • When there are many children visiting, secure your firearms in a proper lock-box, safe, or unreachable location that you can monitor. Keep all spare ammo separate from the guns.
  • If you’re child is alone in the house regularly, consider getting a small safe or lockbox to keep your firearms in when you are not there.
  • Be sure to follow all of the rules you set for your children. If you violate any of them, the child will feel comfortable in following your example.
ATAC Firearms

Recent Videos

AK-47 Rifle Shooting...
ATAC TV firing position for the AK-47 / Kalashnikov rifle vi...AK-47 Rifle Shooting...
AK-47 Rifle Squattin...
ATAC TV's Jim Fuller works with Alex Schoenauer on shooting ...AK-47 Rifle Squattin...
AK-47 Rifle Loading ...
ATAC TV loading and unloading program with Jim Fuller. Jim t...AK-47 Rifle Loading ...
February 2012
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829
©2010 Jim Fuller. All Rights Reserved! | Web Design: Online Alley